Gay Directors, Gay Films?: Pedro Almodóvar, Terence Davies, Todd Haynes, Gus Van Sant, John Waters

Gay Directors Gay Films Pedro Almod var Terence Davies Todd Haynes Gus Van Sant John Waters Through intimate encounters with the life and work of five contemporary gay male directors this book develops a framework for interpreting what it means to make a gay film or adopt a gay point of vie

  • Title: Gay Directors, Gay Films?: Pedro Almodóvar, Terence Davies, Todd Haynes, Gus Van Sant, John Waters
  • Author: Emanuel Levy
  • ISBN: null
  • Page: 157
  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • Through intimate encounters with the life and work of five contemporary gay male directors, this book develops a framework for interpreting what it means to make a gay film or adopt a gay point of view For most of the twentieth century, gay characters and gay themes were both underrepresented and misrepresented in mainstream cinema Since the 1970s, however, a new generaThrough intimate encounters with the life and work of five contemporary gay male directors, this book develops a framework for interpreting what it means to make a gay film or adopt a gay point of view For most of the twentieth century, gay characters and gay themes were both underrepresented and misrepresented in mainstream cinema Since the 1970s, however, a new generation of openly gay directors has turned the closet inside out, bringing a new and poignant immediacy to modern cinema and popular culture.Combining his experienced critique with in depth interviews conducted with each director, Emanuel Levy draws a clear timeline of gay filmmaking over the past four decades and its particular influences and innovations While recognizing the queering of American culture that resulted from these films, Levy also takes stock of the ensuing conservative backlash and its impact on cinematic art, a trend that continues alongside the growing acceptance of homosexuality He compares the similarities and differences between the North American attitudes of Todd Haynes, Gus Van Sant, and John Waters and the European perspectives of Pedro Almod var and Terence Davies, developing a truly comprehensive, up to date approach to gay filmmaking in particular and auteur cinema in general.

    One thought on “Gay Directors, Gay Films?: Pedro Almodóvar, Terence Davies, Todd Haynes, Gus Van Sant, John Waters”

    1. A humdinger of a read, and yes, I just said that about a book that seems to be a text book; BUT it's so much more. This is a fascinating look at 5 gay directors and looks at their films through a sociological, cinematic and queer lens. The reader gets a biography of each director and gets to se how their upbringing and personal history comes into play with their films, or doesn't as the case may be. Looking to answer the question, "do gay directors make gay films", and discovering that they do a [...]

    2. Read half of this for a book club and some of the conclusion--I think it was enough though. We decided beforehand that we wanted to stop at the halfway point, but I probably would have stopped earlier on my own. Author had some compelling questions in the beginning but never presented a coherent thesis or argument later on. Basically a summary of the directors' work with some interpretation through a gay lens. The analyses themselves were weak, which overall detracted from the argument, or some [...]

    3. Unfortunately 80% of this book was spent giving detailed descriptions of each director's films with occasional comparisons to scenes in other films that appear to have influenced the director or that were created as homages. Since I am very familiar with 4 of the 5 directors referenced there was very little new information for me in this book. Near the end of the book the author states that he did not intend to include any biographical information on the directors. Had I know that going in I pro [...]

    4. Far too often film scholarship consists of descriptions of films without any real analysis. Levy's book which has a promising idea never rises above this kind of problem. Looking at the work of Almodovar, Davies, Haynes, Van Sant and Waters, which is in itself an ambitious enterprise, the book presents more biographical and descriptive detail than analysis. Too often the writing suffers not only from this weakness in content but also because the author celebrates his own relationship to the film [...]

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *